Patricia Highsmith’s last novel Small g has just come out in paperback, and with its absorbing and deceptively light story, it makes for an interesting summer read. Moving the book forward at a quick pace is the fierce plotting of its villain, a fashion designer named Renate Hagnauer. The homophobic Renate was once married and still presents herself as straight, but her strongest emotional attachment is to one of her female apprentices, Luisa Zimmerman. Like Highsmith’s best-known character Tom Ripley who idolizes the first man he ever murders, Renate cannot help but punish the object of her obsession. Her treatment of Luisa is less obviously brutal than the murder that Ripley metes out, but the wounded rage behind her manipulations and outbursts should be familiar to Ripley fans. The fact that Renate does not go to the same extremes as Ripley makes it possible for her to exist in the middle of an oddly light-hearted novel. The young Luisa, while escaping her employer’s sadism, finds romance along with friendship at her neighborhood bar in Zurich. The nickname of this bar, “the small g,” refers to a typographical notation in a guidebook: the bar with its partially gay clientele has a lowercase “g” next to its listing.

The combination of heavier and lighter elements – Renate’s psychological violence with Luisa’s romances – makes for a disturbing read at times. To get the disparate plots to fit together, Highsmith sacrificed the psychological depth that characterizes much of her work. Renate’s point of view is provided only in brief glimpses; I wanted more but recognized that too much of this pained consciousness would pull down the overall tone of the book. Luisa is not revealed in much detail either. For much of the novel, she is seen through the eyes of Rickie Markwalder, a gay man who helps her escape Renate’s economic and emotional control. Ricky is explored mostly on the surface too, but since he is fairly superficial – his first encounter with Luisa in the novel yields the observation that she is “so pretty” with “narrow lips, ready to smile” – Highsmith’s thin treatment of him seems more like an appropriate approach to his character and less like an eerie loss.

The irony of Small g is complicated, and I would not recommend it to someone unfamiliar with Highsmith. I would start with Strangers on a Train, The Price of Salt, The Talented Mr. Ripley or my favorite The Animal Lover’s Book of Beastly Murder. But for those who know Highsmith and the richness of her ironies, Small g does provide a curious view onto gay culture – its smallness and sincere joys, its wealth and poverty and its fragility.

Originally posted on 7.30.2005

The women in Roshni Rustomji’s novel The Braided Tongue are some of the most interesting, insightful people I have met in a contemporary novel in a long time. At the center of the book is Katy Cooper, a painter in her forties who embarks on a search for knowledge about her past. When she was child on the brink of adolescence, her father died, and she was forced to move from Mexico to the United States to live with white foster parents. She doesn’t remember much about her life in Mexico or about the circumstances of her father’s death, but what memories she does have are powerful and sensory – the sound of her father, who was originally from Devinagar, India, singing “K-K-K-Katy beeauutiifuul Katy” to her; the vibrant colors of the bougainvillea and roses and the more muted hues and shades of the “raucous birds”; “the rich textures, the complicated tastes” and “the rough fragrances” of Mexican food. This last memory fueled a “silent obsession” in Katy when she was young and living with her foster parents, Gregory and Theresa Saunders. Narrating the book as an adult, Katy says: “Many of the doodles in the margins of my notebooks started out as attempts to draw the hunger I lived with as I ate the foods Theresa Saunders served me with such loving care and generosity.”

Mrs. Saunders took Katy, who suffered pain in her legs, to four doctors, none of whom could arrive at a diagnosis. To ease her foster mother’s anxiety, Katy learned to hide this pain, which has followed her into adulthood and now, over twenty years later, is leading her to explore alternative methods of healing. If she is going to cure this pain and not merely numb or deny it, she must turn to resources outside of the medical industry, and her most powerful resources in this regard are her two close friends, Carmelita and Ratna, and a cousin from India, Roxanna Japanwallah. These memorable women help Katy as she travels to both India and Mexico to learn about her ancestral roots and to deal with the origins of her physical and psychic pain. What emerges from Katy’s journeys is an intricate and illuminating story about powerful women coming up against the immense greed and racist exploitation that is America’s great export at the moment.

It is a testament to the complexity of Rustomji’s vision that this novel is full of faith and hope.

Originally posted on 6.22.2005

I came across Maeve Brennan’s novella The Visitor in a used bookstore a few months ago and was thrilled, having just finished a collection of Brennan’s short stories, Springs of Affection. Those stories are all set in the author’s birthplace of Dublin, and through their form and genius, they capture one of the most haunting aspects of those few years called childhood: their literal smallness is at such odds with their profundity. The experience of reading those stories has stayed with me, and I think of them often; and now I find myself thinking over The Visitor frequently too. At under one hundred pages, it is an enormous book about revenge, bitterness, hope and familial love. I would recommend it to anyone, but for those who are interested in that intense, seldom-used form of the novella, it is an amazing gift. The history of the book’s publication underscores just how amazing: the manuscript was only discovered in a university archive after Brennan’s death in 1993.

Originally posted on 5.28.2005

The Blue Books [Coach House Books, 2003] brings together Nicole Brossard’s first three novels: A Book, Turn of a Pang and French Kiss, or, A Pang’s Progress. In the introduction, Brossard discusses how fiction has changed since these novels were published in the 1970s. She writes that part of fiction has gone off with reality – and “reality, as we know, is now an industry.” Another part has “morphed in autobio/fiction at the speed of me descending the staircase of life.” Another “perpetuates the work of writers seeking new spaces within language as a place to deploy their quest for meaning.” All of these factions, Brossard writes, have generated a shift away from “emotion” toward a more controlled state: the writer is now experiencing a feeling generated by the imagination. This feeling is “the much sought-after thrill” that comes from anticipating the “outcome of the formal performance” of the finished work. Brossard asserts that nowhere in contemporary fiction are we entering the present as experienced by the writer – the pen moving across the page, the keys of the computer or typewriter being pressed, the moment of expression coming into being. The present in fiction according to Brossard has become tautological. It circles back onto itself as a time created in the past by the writer imagining the future.

Brossard goes on to make an interesting remark about the hand that grips the pen, the fingers that press the keys, the writer who desires to reach out and communicate through words: “The body (a theme my generation cherished above all else and hastened to associate with the pleasures, disorders and impulses connected with writing), the body, from here on fragmented right down to its genes, is today an installation, an object, a veritable shopping mall. And so what of our humanity?”

I didn’t read The Blue Books recently. I read the novels last summer, but not until recently could I articulate much about them. The experience of reading them was intense, but I could not say how or why largely because of the density and difficulty of the material. I found the last of the three novels, French Kiss, or A Pang’s Progress, translated from the French by Patricia Claxton, to be particularly hard. I was humbled to learn in Claxton’s foreword that her translation “is a little more accessible than the underlying French.” Only now almost a year later can I say that the last book was hard with the physical act of writing about passion – lesbian passion – as it is rushes into and through the hard fact of the word – “turning into language all the urges that beckon and invite her to partake,” Brossard writes.

Variations in typeface within French Kiss emphasize the hard physical reality of a book, its ink, its paper. Some chapters appear in large font and reveal a shared passion for truth at odds with the lifeless world that impersonally tries to lull and trick the individual into forgetting what she has learned in and through her body. “Our part in reality was that we weren’t taken in by anything,” Brossard writes in one of these large-print chapters. Coming after many chapters of more obscure sentences rendered in smaller font, these words are so clear and visible they make “normal”-sized font look for a moment like tricky fine print. “At least we managed to communicate among ourselves all the fragments of knowledge and wisdom each of us had access to from our own enquiry and experience.”

Our part in reality was that we weren’t taken in by anything.

It’s a hard part to play, not being taken in by anything. In telling the story of those playing this part, French Kiss subverts fictional conventions that, through their familiarity, take readers in. Without these conventions, a book is hard, but the hardness of French Kiss makes sense and cannot be separated from its characters, the alluring part that is taking them in and the un-story of their lives – but my fingers, after typing this last statement, paused. I deleted and retyped the sentence and then went to the top of this document to copy and paste in here Brossard’s statement about the contemporary body – that the body is now “fragmented right down to its genes.”

It’s probably naive to say in 2005 that a trait of a book cannot be isolated and removed from its original context. The hands typing these words know the reality of genetic engineering, having been formed in part by tomatoes crossed with cloned bacteria and potatoes engineered with genes from chickens. No financial incentive exists to isolate the hardness of experimental fiction and introduce the trait elsewhere, but experimentalism does have one appealing gene that the publishing industry’s market-tested crops conspicuously lack: excitement and newness, the thrill that comes from reading what has never been done before. What if the publishing industry were to isolate this trait and introduce it into their products, which, while easy to read, are often predictable and boring?

What if they could introduce the firefly’s cloned light into their dependable fields of corn? How their sentimental novels would glow, and the firefly – an organism on the edge of extinction – would never be able to say a word about the engineered result without being charged with jealousy. After all, the light emanating from these crops would far exceed the glow produced by the individual tail. What if? I ask again, trying like the firefly to illuminate a passing moment in a world of too much light. The surplus is one of the reasons fireflies are becoming extinct. They can’t see each other.

Originally posted on 5.6.2005

Valerie Taylor’s The Girls in 3B led me into a series of books being put out by The Feminist Press entitled Femme Fatales: Women Write Pulp. I enjoyed Taylor’s novel about three young women, one of whom is lesbian, who are struggling to make it on their own in Chicago. Motivated by The Girls, I bought more books in the series and so had the pleasure of reading Dorothy B. Hughes’s work for the first time. Hughes started out her career as a poet before going on to write mysteries in a hard-edged, noir style. The Feminist Press has released two of her novels, both of which are fast reads because they are impossible to put down: The Blackbirder and In a Lonely Place. Feeding into the most striking difference between the two books is an essential similarity: both are written in the third-person limited point of view. But in The Blackbirder, the perspective is limited to a young woman with ties to the French Resistance who is now on the run, and in In A Lonely Place, the perspective is with a male serial killer. Both characters are trying their best to survive, which, in the case of the serial killer, means not getting caught. The blind spots that get in their way speak volumes about the limits of masculine and feminine roles. In the interest of not spoiling plots, I will say no more about the books except that I generally don’t like novels about serial killers. I don’t like descriptions of violence, especially when, having been processed into entertainment, the descriptions have no real meaning. Hughes, however, doesn’t write about the violent acts themselves but focuses on the consciousness that makes the violence possible.

Originally posted on 3.26.2005